View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dankcannabis Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 7:32 pm Post subject: Ram question |
|
|
If I go from 4gb of ram to 24 will there be a significant difference? (haven't bought ram in and while and realized how cheap it is)
I have a 64bit OS too
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phox I post too much
Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 2034
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps if you have 4 now you'll notice a difference, but it's unlikely that 24 will offer more performance than 8. It's not unlike hard drive space. I'm never going to fill up my 1 terabyte hard drive, so it would be pointless for me to get a 2 terabyte hard drive.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Slugsnack Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 71
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 1857
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Potentially your system will go faster since your OS is likely gonna use that extra memory to cache application loads. However whether this is going to be enough to have a 'significant difference', I couldn't say.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SF I'm a spammer
Reputation: 119
Joined: 19 Mar 2007 Posts: 6028
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
You simply won't use it for there to be much of a different. You could go to 12 for half the price and still never use the full 12 for general home use, at least. Your processor will prolly bottleneck from the amount of applications you'd have to run before you'd get close to using the RAM.
Or get the 24 and look at http://memory.dataram.com/products-and-services/software/ramdisk
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dankcannabis Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
SF wrote: | You simply won't use it for there to be much of a different. You could go to 12 for half the price and still never use the full 12 for general home use, at least. Your processor will prolly bottleneck from the amount of applications you'd have to run before you'd get close to using the RAM.
Or get the 24 and look at http://memory.dataram.com/products-and-services/software/ramdisk |
Having an i7 920, I think I'm going to go with 8gb since I usually never go above 4gb anyways
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thewizkid Newbie cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 02 May 2011 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
What OS are you running..?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not all 64bit OS are equal
Maximum memory size on 64bit OSes: Windows 7
Starter: 8GB (don't recall start with 64bit, but that's what that site posted)
Home Basic: 8GB
Home Premium: 16GB
Professional: 192GB
Enterprise: 192GB
Ultimate: 192GB
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phox I post too much
Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 2034
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SF wrote: | You simply won't use it for there to be much of a different. You could go to 12 for half the price and still never use the full 12 for general home use, at least. Your processor will prolly bottleneck from the amount of applications you'd have to run before you'd get close to using the RAM.
Or get the 24 and look at http://memory.dataram.com/products-and-services/software/ramdisk | Is this program worth using to utilize ~768 mb of ram?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AhMunRa Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 27
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 1117
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Dataram RAMDisk cannot make use of memory that is not available in 32-bit Windows systems between 3 and 4 GB. RAMDisk can use memory not "seen" by 32-bit Windows ABOVE 4 GB, i.e. 6 or 8 GB. |
That's an oxymoron. I understand that x86 doesn't make anything above 4 gb Windows doesn't make available. x86 according to MSDN still has 4 gb limitation. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
_________________
<Wiccaan> Bah that was supposed to say 'not saying its dead' lol. Fixing >.> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dankcannabis Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kls85 wrote: | Not all 64bit OS are equal
Maximum memory size on 64bit OSes: Windows 7
Starter: 8GB (don't recall start with 64bit, but that's what that site posted)
Home Basic: 8GB
Home Premium: 16GB
Professional: 192GB
Enterprise: 192GB
Ultimate: 192GB |
Wow thanks I never knew this O__O
luckily I have the ultimate edition for some reason
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phox I post too much
Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 2034
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhMunRa wrote: | Quote: | Dataram RAMDisk cannot make use of memory that is not available in 32-bit Windows systems between 3 and 4 GB. RAMDisk can use memory not "seen" by 32-bit Windows ABOVE 4 GB, i.e. 6 or 8 GB. |
That's an oxymoron. I understand that x86 doesn't make anything above 4 gb Windows doesn't make available. x86 according to MSDN still has 4 gb limitation. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778%28v=vs.85%29.aspx | I think they're trying to say that if you have a 1 gb graphics card and as a result you have "3 gb usable", you can't use the lost gb as a ramdisk. But if you have 6 gb and 3 usable, you can make a 2 gb ramdisk. And frankly...that doesn't make any sense at all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte Site Admin
Reputation: 470
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 25778 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RRamdisk (not a typo, and get a more recent version) can make use of more than 4GB ram on a 32-bit windows install
32-bit can address up to 64GB physical ram (using PAE paging mode, which is enabled for most people anyhow)
While it's true that the virtual memory space can only take up 4GB ram at most (and 2GB/usermode process at most, but you just create an extra process for extra storage space, just requires a swap when accessing the other 2GB) it can be addresses
As for the videocard 'eating' memory is wrong. The physical memory just gets remapped to the upper 4GB+ region
So:
On a computer with 6 GB RAM and a videocard with 1GB and a 32-bit windows install you can use RRamdisk to create a 3GB ramdisk and still have 3GB RAM left for windows
Doing this of course means you should not use any other tool that accesses the upper 4GB ram on a 32-bit system, because windows does not provide a proper way of sharing that memory between processes (let alone allocate it the normal way)
--
For those who feel like playing with it:
Configure windows to pae mode if it isn't already
use CE and enable kernelmode read/write memory
Go to address 0xc0000008
and write in the physical address you want to map (4kb alignment and may be above the 4GB range) and make the first byte a 67
Then view the memory at 0x1000 and that physical address will be mapped there
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|