| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cx
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 367
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:24 pm Post subject: [Beta/Release] ByteFunctions.dll |
 |
|
Well, I wanted to try something today. It resulted in ByteFunctions.dll.
Right now it only has two functions. It's only a beta, I'd like some testing and some feedback.
YOU MUST BE USING THIS FROM INSIDE THE PROCESS THAT YOU ARE USING IT ON!
Inject a DLL into the process that uses this.
It exports two functions. Use LoadLibrary to load the .DLL, then GetProcAddress to get the address of the functions.
IScan:
Scans bytes of the current process.
Return value is the FIRST found address.
The first parameter is the unsigned long value of the address you are scanning for (little endian or decimal, 4 bytes).
The second parameter is a dword address to start the scanning at.
The third parameter is a dword address to end the scanning at.
If no addresses are found, the returned value is 0.
SetBytes:
Sets the bytes at a specified address.
The first parameter is the DWORD address to change the bytes at.
The second parameter is the value to change the address to (4-bytes, little endian/decimal, unsigned long value).
DL gone while I learn a bit more.
_________________
armed with this small butterfly net
i will face the world alone
& never be lonely.
Last edited by Cx on Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Int3
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 862
Location: British Columbia
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So its a poison 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[SPW]Jsin
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 1251
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fuck jeahhh
superimposing sexy bodies wit "Hermione's" (forgot her name =[ ) head.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
appalsap
Moderator
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 6753
Location: Pakistan
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We CAN'T use LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress to call your functions because you compiled as C++ and thus your function names are decorated. Post the .lib file that your compiler automatically generates anyway. Also, post a header file so we know exactly what parameters to pass to the application and document the return values.
Or better yet, open source it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cx
Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 367
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ofuck.
?IScan@@YAKKKK@Z
?SetBytes@@YAXKK@Z
lulz.
_________________
armed with this small butterfly net
i will face the world alone
& never be lonely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
giveme
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 933
Location: GMS - Khaini
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| so it doesnt work
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
appalsap
Moderator
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 6753
Location: Pakistan
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yep. There's no reason to use this anyway, the first function, "IScan" was released, source and all, in a thread I posted where an unnamed friend contributed some code. The second is ridiculous, there is a feature in C that allows you to do this with no hassle, it is the dereference operator, that little * you put in front of values to let the compiler know your variable is an address. As an added treat, you can't statically link, and you have Cx statically linking the whole C++ runtime library (which he doesn't even use). This is what happens when newbie developers think their code is so special they don't want anyone to see it but want everyone to use it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cx
Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 367
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| appalsap wrote: | | Yep. There's no reason to use this anyway, the first function, "IScan" was released, source and all, in a thread I posted where an unnamed friend contributed some code. The second is ridiculous, there is a feature in C that allows you to do this with no hassle, it is the dereference operator, that little * you put in front of values to let the compiler know your variable is an address. As an added treat, you can't statically link, and you have Cx statically linking the whole C++ runtime library (which he doesn't even use). This is what happens when newbie developers think their code is so special they don't want anyone to see it but want everyone to use it. |
You always have to be such an ass.
1) I don't want anyone to see it because I know that it's innefficient and bad, and you gave KiKi one hell of a time for his barely inefficient coding (so I don't think it's special either, ass).
2) I don't care if anyone uses this.
3) This whole thing was so that I could learn.
| Cx wrote: | | I'd like some testing and some feedback. |
Fuck you. I was thankful for your comments up until now. You had to blow it to make yourself look so fucking awesome (but the fact that you leaked the first one decreases your rank on the fucking awesome meter).
_________________
armed with this small butterfly net
i will face the world alone
& never be lonely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
appalsap
Moderator
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 6753
Location: Pakistan
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cx wrote: | ...1) I don't want anyone to see it because I know that it's innefficient and bad...
3) This whole thing was so that I could learn. |
That is exactly why you post the code, so other people contribute suggestions and ideas. This is the general programming section after all.
| Cx wrote: | | ...(but the fact that you leaked the first one decreases your rank on the fucking awesome meter). |
Sounds like you copied that code 
It's a difference in ideals. I believe in free flow of information, you like to lock up and restrict as much code as possible, what's "leaking" to you is "sharing" to me- how could anyone new ever learn if we don't share code? There are a lot of things to consider before releasing a closed library so it is actually usable to people.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Uligor
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 956
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I seriously doubt Cx would steal code figuring he's learning, it wouldn't make any sense.
And about the export names, you could just check the export directory.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Uligor
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 956
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| x0r wrote: | | Won't step on your toes but I will say this, these functions both seem trivial and a waste of space, come on... a DWORD scan loop?! A DWORD writer? You advertised this as a possible way of using MapleStory hacks but you're just trying to trump up something minuscule and pointless, anyone with the knowledge to import a library could perform both functions without this needless dependency. I suggest you scrap the second option and just post the LIB to a complete AoB function which works on any operand size (DWORD is too small) and dynamically sees what memory is pageable. |
You forget he's still learning.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sphere90
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 912
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cx, you can always change the export name to something that is not decorated by using a .def file
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
assaf84
Expert Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Oct 2006
Posts: 238
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Uligor wrote: | | x0r wrote: | | Won't step on your toes but I will say this, these functions both seem trivial and a waste of space, come on... a DWORD scan loop?! A DWORD writer? You advertised this as a possible way of using MapleStory hacks but you're just trying to trump up something minuscule and pointless, anyone with the knowledge to import a library could perform both functions without this needless dependency. I suggest you scrap the second option and just post the LIB to a complete AoB function which works on any operand size (DWORD is too small) and dynamically sees what memory is pageable. |
You forget he's still learning. |
I agree with x0r. The functions are useless, he didn't had to "release" it, it looks pretty pathetic..
If you release something you should make something that people will actually use.. And if you're just learning and don't have an idea, simply don't release XD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Uligor
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 956
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| assaf84 wrote: | | Uligor wrote: | | x0r wrote: | | Won't step on your toes but I will say this, these functions both seem trivial and a waste of space, come on... a DWORD scan loop?! A DWORD writer? You advertised this as a possible way of using MapleStory hacks but you're just trying to trump up something minuscule and pointless, anyone with the knowledge to import a library could perform both functions without this needless dependency. I suggest you scrap the second option and just post the LIB to a complete AoB function which works on any operand size (DWORD is too small) and dynamically sees what memory is pageable. |
You forget he's still learning. |
I agree with x0r. The functions are useless, he didn't had to "release" it, it looks pretty pathetic..
If you release something you should make something that people will actually use.. And if you're just learning and don't have an idea, simply don't release XD |
Well damn my eyes because everytime I look I see beta/release and not release.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Uligor
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 956
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| x0r wrote: | | Uligor wrote: | | You forget he's still learning. |
Not at all, I just expected quite a bit more from him... let me rephrase; I expect more out of anyone using the phrase release for such a thing. (don't try to put emphasis on 'beta' because this isn't even worthy of such a title) |
It isn't up to you to decide wether it's worthy or not.
| x0r wrote: | | Uligor wrote: | | Well damn my eyes because everytime I look I see beta/release and not release. |
Again, since when is a CMP loop & a MOV worthy of being called a release? Hm, maybe I should release a program with just an int3 and call it "x0r's magical debugger checker". |
Quite frankly I wouldn't be surprised.
| x0r wrote: | | Lastly, something like this shouldn't be coded in C/C++ since their memory management is nowhere near as efficient as the pure ASM iteration. |
People code in the language they want, it isn't up to you to decide who uses what language.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
