View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ZacTheSin I post too much
Reputation: 6
Joined: 09 May 2006 Posts: 2657
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Internet explorer is still the industry standard.
Autotask (CRM Software) only supports IE for it's admin panel. They're slowly accepting usage of other browsers though for it's other parts though.
_________________
If someone helps you, why not Rep them? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hero I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 7154
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My pc bsod'd while running 2 flash based videos at once, one in full screen. Was weird. My pc never bsod besides the occasional one from playing bc2, but thats driver related.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
isarah How do I cheat?
Reputation: 0
Joined: 23 Mar 2011 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tried the beta but i couldn't feel it , so im hesitating about getting it
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AhMunRa Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 27
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 1117
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PunkMilitia Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: -1
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 1270 Location: South England.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hero wrote: | My pc bsod'd while running 2 flash based videos at once, one in full screen. Was weird. My pc never bsod besides the occasional one from playing bc2, but thats driver related. |
Sounds to me liek you have hit a wall in yoru over-clocking, if your CPU isn't over-clocked then I recommend you check if they are overheated.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
XSV GTH Moderator
Reputation: 9
Joined: 12 Oct 2005 Posts: 1007 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm undecided about moving to FF4, i like the feel of 3.6.16. The new FF4 seems too "Chrome"-y.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
InternetIsSeriousBusiness Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 8
Joined: 12 Jul 2010 Posts: 1269
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
XSV wrote: | I'm undecided about moving to FF4, i like the feel of 3.6.16. The new FF4 seems too "Chrome"-y. |
It is a lot bit chromey. I don't know why firefox feels they need to immitate other browsers. Firefox was only popular because how unique it was compared to other browsers. So what sense does 4.0 make?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hero I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 7154
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cats wrote: | XSV wrote: | I'm undecided about moving to FF4, i like the feel of 3.6.16. The new FF4 seems too "Chrome"-y. |
It is a lot bit chromey. I don't know why firefox feels they need to immitate other browsers. Firefox was only popular because how unique it was compared to other browsers. So what sense does 4.0 make? | It feels the same to me with just extra shit. It will never be like chrome until it fails at extension support.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PunkMilitia Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: -1
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 1270 Location: South England.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Firefox was once upon a time ahead of it's competition (IE)
due to it's advertising & extensions & it was a bit faster too.
IE has kept improving since then and FF pretty much has
stayed the same but alot of people keep on the FF wagon
because they think it still has the upper hand which it does
only inthe form of extensions.
Other browsers have been rivaling FF in the extension
department such as Opera and Chrome will surely follow.
This is not a browser war, it's a war on oppinions -
IE does most things correctly - not always at the best speed though
FF looks OK and has extensions but is slower than most
Chrome looks good and is fast enough with great support and
helps with cloud computing
Opera is fast, secure, looks good and has extensions which
expand as more and more people switch.
Opera looks like the "best" browser however due to me using the cloud
alot I used Chrome which I find not as good as Opera but whatever.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atom0s Moderator
Reputation: 204
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 8577 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
PunkMilitia wrote: | Firefox was once upon a time ahead of it's competition (IE)
due to it's advertising & extensions & it was a bit faster too.
IE has kept improving since then and FF pretty much has
stayed the same but alot of people keep on the FF wagon
because they think it still has the upper hand which it does
only inthe form of extensions.
Other browsers have been rivaling FF in the extension
department such as Opera and Chrome will surely follow.
This is not a browser war, it's a war on oppinions -
IE does most things correctly - not always at the best speed though
FF looks OK and has extensions but is slower than most
Chrome looks good and is fast enough with great support and
helps with cloud computing
Opera is fast, secure, looks good and has extensions which
expand as more and more people switch.
Opera looks like the "best" browser however due to me using the cloud
alot I used Chrome which I find not as good as Opera but whatever. |
Firefox is probably one of the only (few) browsers that follows internet standards (HTML, CSS, Javascript, etc.) making web development seamless where as other browsers, mainly IE, go off on their own ideas and make a lot of things just not work at all or require hackish methods to get to work.
Sadly IE (Microsoft) doesn't listen to its users at all and is doing the same thing with IE9. The browser doesn't properly follow these standards as it should and a nice handful of sites already break when viewing in the RC of IE9.
Opera is a lost cause. And far from secure.
If you want to check out some studies regarding security:
http://www.nsslabs.com/research/endpoint-security/browser-security/
Keep in mind IE9 is going to be leading a lot of the tests beings that it is new while the other browsers have been on the 'market' for a while and have been fiddled with enough to get around their security measures where as IE has a fresh slate to work on.
_________________
- Retired. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PunkMilitia Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: -1
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 1270 Location: South England.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry Wican but it has been proving many, MANY times before that FF is less secure & slower than most fo the other browsers:
http://home.comcast.net/~SupportCD/FirefoxMyths.html
Is a good read, it doesn't say anything on FF4 but in the end FF4 is worst than FF3.
I did have a look at W3C tests between FF4, IE 7 & Opera anyway just in case and surprise, surprise FF has the worst bench.
Thought I should throw that out there too - but like I said earlier, if you want extensions but a bad browser get FF, nothing wrong with wanting extensions. (even-though Opera & Chrome have the important ones)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atom0s Moderator
Reputation: 204
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 8577 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
My post didn't once mention speed. Sorry but a homebrewed Comcast site from a fanboy isn't exactly valid proof of anything. Having institutions handle the testing without bias is more valid then someone ranting on about their opinion.
The link you gave goes off hear-say opinions. Not actual facts about the browsers. Not even facts or opinions from the creators of the browsers. (Not just Firefox, he menitons others with opinions as well.)
He does link to some valid testing information:
Opera: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/10615/
- Effected by 56 Vulnerabilities
- Unfixed: 4%
IE6: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/11/
- Effected by 227 Vulnerabilities
- Unfixed: 15%
IE8: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/
- Effected by 78 Vulnerabilities
- Unfixed: 32%
FF3: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28698/
- Effected by 96 Vulnerabilities
- Unfixed: 0%
Sadly he doesn't mention that info on his site, guess he "missed" it. /sarcasm Funny how FF is the only one that keeps up to date with known vulnerabilities.
Google Chrome isn't on this site either so can't post any info from this specific site regarding that. They mention they support it but they don't have a page for it yet.
Vulnerabilities are also fault to what runs inside the browser. For example, Flash. There are plenty of exploits and vulnerabilities in Flash that are not the fault of the browser, but the implementation of the controller itself. Given that each browser has to have the controller implemented differently, there are bound to be exploits that work on one browser but not another.
As for speed, I personally don't care which browser is faster. I don't use a browser because it starts .5 milliseconds faster then another. I stick to a browser for security, extensions that I personally use/need, and best fits me. Is FF the fastest? Probably not. But even the links you gave prove its the most secure.
Quote: | Thought I should throw that out there too - but like I said earlier, if you want extensions but a bad browser get FF, nothing wrong with wanting extensions. (even-though Opera & Chrome have the important ones)
|
You do realize you are trying to fight an argument using facts then an opinion right? Making your argument completely invalid. Not that I care what browser you use, but trying to convince people otherwise to use something you personally like and discourage them to use something you dislike is major fault in your post.
By the way what "oh-so-important" extensions do you keep referring to?
_________________
- Retired. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PunkMilitia Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: -1
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 1270 Location: South England.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wican, you do see FF was the least secure in all of those tests (apart from ie6 which is VERY outdated now and unfair to test on.), right? Fail.
also - like I said earlier, Choosing a browser is mostly based on yoru opinion of the browser and your uses for it I use chrome because I use the Cloud alot - FF users use FF for extensions - Opera users use Opera for the best all round browsing experience and so on.
Ad-Blockers and other extensions are the extensions I class as important.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atom0s Moderator
Reputation: 204
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Posts: 8577 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PunkMilitia wrote: | Wican, you do see FF was the least secure in all of those tests (apart from ie6 which is VERY outdated now and unfair to test on.), right? Fail. |
You're basing that off the number of found vulnerabilities? That's whats fail. That doesn't mean the browser is the most insecure, could be it's just a higher targeted application. But apparently you skip over the fixed % seeing how FF has all known issues fixed, where as other browsers don't.
PunkMilitia wrote: | also - like I said earlier, Choosing a browser is mostly based on yoru opinion of the browser and your uses for it I use chrome because I use the Cloud alot - FF users use FF for extensions - Opera users use Opera for the best all round browsing experience and so on.
|
I laughed at that statement.
PunkMilitia wrote: |
Ad-Blockers and other extensions are the extensions I class as important. |
'other extensions' is not what I wanted as an answer, you are avoiding the question. Ad-blockers are common in all browser extension releases, and you keep saying 'the cloud' like there is only one in the world. Be more specific. And I'm sure Google Chrome isn't the only browser capable of accessing it.
_________________
- Retired. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AhMunRa Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 27
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 1117
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@PunkMalitia
Note the percentages of those vulns that remain unfixed.
IE8: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/
- Effected by 78 Vulnerabilities
- Unfixed: 32%
FF3: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/28698/
- Effected by 96 Vulnerabilities
- Unfixed: 0%
Also IE has never held to standards, even ones they themselves set.
The Acid test. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3 Developed to test browsers adherance to standards set by Web Standards Project.
Some results http://www.devseo.co.uk/blog/view/the-acid-3-test-the-latest-browser-results Take these with a grain of salt. I don't trust their results on IE8 are genuine. Personally I think it would score way higher than what they list.
The good news. There is no one browser that we all have to use. We are all able to chose the ones which we prefer. Isn't it great!
I stopped using IE just when Mozilla came out. It was way better than IE in those days, mainly due to it disallowing pop-ups from day one. IE in those days was riddled with them. I have just stuck with it ever since. I do like Safari though. As far as Google Chrome. I hate it. I like the look, but there is something very very Big Brotheresque about Google these days.
I use FF not for extensions, but because in my experience the FF team has listened to users and given us what we wanted. Tabbed browsing, 1st, popup blockers, 1st again. A browser that doesn't get pwned by an image with an improperly formatted header, 1st once more.
Now on the other side of the coin. From a business and administration standpoint, IE is head and shoulders over any other browser. This is due to it's integration into Windows though.
_________________
<Wiccaan> Bah that was supposed to say 'not saying its dead' lol. Fixing >.> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|