| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which Language is best? |
| Assembly |
|
11% |
[ 5 ] |
| Batch/DOS |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| C/C++ |
|
40% |
[ 18 ] |
| C# |
|
4% |
[ 2 ] |
| Cobol |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Delphi |
|
18% |
[ 8 ] |
| Java |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Perl |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Python |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| .NETs |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| Visual Basic (pick this one and die) |
|
20% |
[ 9 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 44 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Localhost
I post too much
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 3402
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:36 am Post subject: |
 |
|
who picked VB? seriously dont
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flyte
Peanuts!!!!
 Reputation: 6
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 1887
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bam2550 wrote: | | who picked VB? seriously dont |
No doubt it was somebody from the flash section. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Khralum
Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 37
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
C/C++. I'd also recommend java. and for any RPG makers out there, use Ruby RGSS 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rapion124
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 1095
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Visual basic is good if you wanna sacrifice memory management and size. It helps you program with Windows APIs without having to memorize all the parameters and stuff. Microsoft made Visual Basic easy for a reason. It's to give the beginning programmers something easy to learn.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Heartless
I post too much
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 2436
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Visual Basic is very easy and fun to learn. But it is not very powerfull. That is why I didn't pick it.
I picked C++ because it is very powerful and that is the programming language I'm learning right now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AtheistCrusader
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 6
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 681
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i would have to choose 2 , VB and C++ but i cant pick both so i picked VB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pseudo Xero
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 2607
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I seriously laughed when I saw that anyone voted for VB.
_________________
| haxory' wrote: | can't VB do anything??
windows is programmed using VB right? correct me if im wrong.
so all things in windows you have like the start menu is a windows form too. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
me
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 2
Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 733
Location: location location
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
English is the best language to learn,
oh ok then,
any of the C languages to start, C/C++ can be learnt free, then you can get onto assembley as a second language to learn as its easier to understand with C behind you,
pascal is what delphi language is based on and what cheat engine is written in so no harm in looking at that as well,
its been around for a while now so learning a bit of delphi programming wouldnt hurt a bit,
but most of all find one you feel comfortable with, one which is powerful enough and just clicks with you
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HomerSexual
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 5
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 1657
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CE's Driver is written in C. The gui is delphi.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
appalsap
Moderator
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 6753
Location: Pakistan
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| me wrote: | | any of the C languages to start, C/C++ can be learnt free, then you can get onto assembley as a second language to learn as its easier to understand with C behind you, |
I will recommend the opposite, learn assembly first, then more of the C language features will become immediately clear (bit manipulation etc)
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
me
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 733
Location: location location
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| appalsap wrote: | | me wrote: | | any of the C languages to start, C/C++ can be learnt free, then you can get onto assembley as a second language to learn as its easier to understand with C behind you, |
I will recommend the opposite, learn assembly first, then more of the C language features will become immediately clear (bit manipulation etc) |
it's just that a lot of assembley tutorials want you to know a higher language first so they dont have to explain declarations loops structures ect,
but whichever way you do it C and assembley compliment each other for understanding,
but point taken
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SkatSkat
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 648
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i am still a firm believer that asm is for the machine to read only. although, it is fun to learn how the machine interprets things.
_________________
"We're betting everything on ourselves tonight" - The Bouncing Souls
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
appalsap
Moderator
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 6753
Location: Pakistan
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SkatSkat wrote: | | i am still a firm believer that asm is for the machine to read only. |
which makes total sense because humans didn't design the machines
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SkatSkat
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 648
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| appalsap wrote: | | SkatSkat wrote: | | i am still a firm believer that asm is for the machine to read only. |
which makes total sense because humans didn't design the machines |
touche. but, if there is a much easier and simpler way for humans to understand something, why shouldn't it be used?
_________________
"We're betting everything on ourselves tonight" - The Bouncing Souls
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
appalsap
Moderator
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 6753
Location: Pakistan
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SkatSkat wrote: | | touche. but, if there is a much easier and simpler way for humans to understand something, why shouldn't it be used? |
Because it isn't easier and simpler. Coding is easy when you can be sure you understand the machine and the machine understands you.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
