Cheat Engine Forum Index Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


still looking for a what.cd

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Random spam
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Cryoma
Member of the Year
Reputation: 198

Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:34 pm    Post subject: still looking for a what.cd Reply with quote

Please let me know if you're trading/selling one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fafaffy
Cheater
Reputation: 65

Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.whatinterviewprep.com/

Don't be lazy. Took me a total of like... 3 hours from wanting an invite, to reading the site, taking the test and being accepted.

Be jealous!

_________________
Brillia wrote:
I FUCKING FUCK SEX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Evil_Intentions
Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65

Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 214

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Test is EZ%

Just take it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
br0l0ck
Cheater
Reputation: 63

Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just use rutracker it has more shit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cryoma
Member of the Year
Reputation: 198

Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't sit at a computer that long without leaving to do things so the test isn't viable for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Antagonist
Cheater
Reputation: 29

Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 48
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

access to this site has no value or worth and only enticed by the people in it. stop wasting your money and time
_________________




tough guy talix wrote:
i've had it with your shit. fuck outta here
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Cryoma
Member of the Year
Reputation: 198

Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819

PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Antagonist wrote:
access to this site has no value or worth and only enticed by the people in it. stop wasting your money and time

It has albums I want that are not available on public trackers, so, it's worth my time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

keeping ratio up is easier than passing the interview
that was before i was a euphoric audio master so i cheated on the interview
not hard as long as you can type fast and not be a dipshit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
br0l0ck
Cheater
Reputation: 63

Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

just tell them this

Quote:
I have a PhD in Digital Music Conservation from the University of Florida. I have to stress that the phenomenon known as "digital dust" is the real problem regarding conservation of music, and any other type of digital file. Digital files are stored in digital filing cabinets called "directories" which are prone to "digital dust" - slight bit alterations that happen now or then. Now, admittedly, in its ideal, pristine condition, a piece of musical work encoded in FLAC format contains more information than the same piece encoded in MP3, however, as the FLAC file is bigger, it accumulates, in fact, MORE digital dust than the MP3 file. Now you might say that the density of dust is the same. That would be a naive view. Since MP3 files are smaller, they can be much more easily stacked together and held in "drawers" called archive files (Zip, Rar, Lha, etc.) ; in such a configuration, their surface-to-volume ratio is minimized. Thus, they accumulate LESS digital dust and thus decay at a much slower rate than FLACs. All this is well-known in academia, alas the ignorant hordes just think that because it's bigger, it must be better.

So over the past months there's been some discussion about the merits of lossy compression and the rotational velocidensity issue. I'm an audiophile myself and posses a vast collection of uncompressed audio files, but I do want to assure the casual low-bitrate users that their music library is quite safe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cryoma
Member of the Year
Reputation: 198

Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nigga I have never read such bullshit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Random spam All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

CE Wiki   IRC (#CEF)   Twitter
Third party websites