| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cokefag
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 130
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:00 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| You're sat outside the spawn with nothing happening around you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| konr wrote: | | You're sat outside the spawn with nothing happening around you. |
Alright, I'll do it again later in a pub.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
br0l0ck
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1440x900 is pretty fucking small
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hero
I'm a spammer
 Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 7154
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Brolock wrote: | | 1440x900 is pretty fucking small |
This.
I cannot settle for less than 1080.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hero wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | 1440x900 is pretty fucking small |
This.
I cannot settle for less than 1080. |
>haven't even read the other thread
>biggest monitor due to whole family using laptops prior to this
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hero
I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 7154
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cokefag wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | 1440x900 is pretty fucking small |
This.
I cannot settle for less than 1080. |
>haven't even read the other thread
>biggest monitor due to whole family using laptops prior to this |
>not having a laptop with HDMI output to use on a monitor bigger than 24'
How do you live with yourself?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Butters
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 71
Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 1373
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hero wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | 1440x900 is pretty fucking small |
This.
I cannot settle for less than 1080. |
>haven't even read the other thread
>biggest monitor due to whole family using laptops prior to this |
>not having a laptop with HDMI output to use on a monitor bigger than 24'
How do you live with yourself? |
>not having a $2500 PC with HDMI output to a 42" television
How do you live with yourself?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
br0l0ck
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Butters wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | 1440x900 is pretty fucking small |
This.
I cannot settle for less than 1080. |
>haven't even read the other thread
>biggest monitor due to whole family using laptops prior to this |
>not having a laptop with HDMI output to use on a monitor bigger than 24'
How do you live with yourself? |
>not having a $2500 PC with HDMI output to a 42" television
How do you live with yourself? |
>42" TV
LOL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Barnold Swolezzenegger
Cheater
 Reputation: 20
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Posts: 45
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Brolock wrote: | | Butters wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | 1440x900 is pretty fucking small |
This.
I cannot settle for less than 1080. |
>haven't even read the other thread
>biggest monitor due to whole family using laptops prior to this |
>not having a laptop with HDMI output to use on a monitor bigger than 24'
How do you live with yourself? |
>not having a $2500 PC with HDMI output to a 42" television
How do you live with yourself? |
>42" TV
LOL |
That's why I went with 47".
We all know TV size is relative to penis size.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
br0l0ck
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Apotheoun wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | Butters wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | 1440x900 is pretty fucking small |
This.
I cannot settle for less than 1080. |
>haven't even read the other thread
>biggest monitor due to whole family using laptops prior to this |
>not having a laptop with HDMI output to use on a monitor bigger than 24'
How do you live with yourself? |
>not having a $2500 PC with HDMI output to a 42" television
How do you live with yourself? |
>42" TV
LOL |
That's why I went with 47".
We all know TV size is relative to penis size. |
>TV
LOL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poiboizo
Newbie cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm jelly, even though you can't really tell a difference past 60fps.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jiiui
How do I cheat?
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| poiboizo wrote: | | I'm jelly, even though you can't really tell a difference past 60fps. |
If your monitor is 60hz, you literally CAN'T tell a difference. No "really" about it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aniblaze
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 138
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 1757
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anything higher than 72 FPS is completely ridiculous and utterly useless, unless you're trying to film something in slow-motion. Anything higher than 72 FPS isn't even detectable with the human brain, be it consciously or subconsciously.
| Quote: | | Douglas Trumbull, who undertook experiments with different frame rates that led to the Showscan film format, found that emotional impact peaked at 72 FPS for viewers. |
- From Wikipedia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 130
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Aniblaze wrote: | Anything higher than 72 FPS is completely ridiculous and utterly useless, unless you're trying to film something in slow-motion. Anything higher than 72 FPS isn't even detectable with the human brain, be it consciously or subconsciously.
| Quote: | | Douglas Trumbull, who undertook experiments with different frame rates that led to the Showscan film format, found that emotional impact peaked at 72 FPS for viewers. |
- From Wikipedia |
Sorry Ani but you're wrong.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
