Cheat Engine :: View topic - Attempt at articuno/ pikachu

Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine

FAQ

Memberlist

Usergroups

Profile

Attempt at articuno/ pikachu
Goto page Previous 1, 2

Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Art

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

sponge cake recipe
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 22

Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 1635

Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:13 pm Post subject:

Sorrow wrote:

Zycthe wrote:

No he drew the pikachu from scratch, didnt use any kind of tracing or what ever. Same with articuno, he put more time in the articuno than the pikachu.

Oh, alright. It looks decent then. c:

>it looks better now that you have more info on it

No, that's stupid.
It looks exactly as it does before, and knowing that shouldn't change your opinion of the actual image.

You really shouldn't be here.
;|

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:50 am Post subject:

Pho/x/ wrote:

GalaxyFrame wrote:

Pikachu was copied, not from scratch. But it wasn't filtered. You can tell it wasn't filtered by comparing the fingers and tail from the original and the new.

Copying the pose isn't the same thing as copying, or tracing.

Showing your idiocy yet again, Phox. You basically just said 'copying it isn't the same as copying it'. Yes it is. It's a Pikachu in the EXACT same pose as the original picture, just redrawn.

Moments
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 17

Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 1196

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 11:00 am Post subject:

Spanito wrote:

Sorrow wrote:

Zycthe wrote:

No he drew the pikachu from scratch, didnt use any kind of tracing or what ever. Same with articuno, he put more time in the articuno than the pikachu.

Oh, alright. It looks decent then. c:

I should of rather put, "It's decent then." If that was drawn from scratch, it's pretty impressive. But, if its just filtered or traced, it's not very amazing.

Phox
I post too much

Reputation: 110

Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 2034

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 11:16 am Post subject:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

GalaxyFrame wrote:

Pikachu was copied, not from scratch. But it wasn't filtered. You can tell it wasn't filtered by comparing the fingers and tail from the original and the new.

Copying the pose isn't the same thing as copying, or tracing.

Showing your idiocy yet again, Phox. You basically just said 'copying it isn't the same as copying it'. Yes it is. It's a Pikachu in the EXACT same pose as the original picture, just redrawn.

Look, so what? Why do you even care if he draws it in the same pose? My point is that it doesn't make it illegitimate art if he uses a reference picture to produce a similar, but differently styled piece. In professional art, it's not unknown for an artist to paint a picture of a famous painting, except using different techniques and/or materials. This is more or less the same thing, and by the way, doing what I just mentioned is a really great way to practice any style.

Off Constantly
How do I cheat?

Reputation: 1

Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 8
Location: Southeast of Detroit, MI

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject:

Yeah dude the beam needs to be straighter. Also the pikachu looks pretty effed up. But i love the Articuno!!!

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:14 am Post subject:

Pho/x/ wrote:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

GalaxyFrame wrote:

Pikachu was copied, not from scratch. But it wasn't filtered. You can tell it wasn't filtered by comparing the fingers and tail from the original and the new.

Copying the pose isn't the same thing as copying, or tracing.

Showing your idiocy yet again, Phox. You basically just said 'copying it isn't the same as copying it'. Yes it is. It's a Pikachu in the EXACT same pose as the original picture, just redrawn.

Honestly you're retarded. I wasn't going to bash on him for copying it like that, but you made it look as if he didn't copy it at all, and as if it was completely different. It isn't just 'in the same pose', it's exactly the same in every single way and I wouldn't be surprised at all if it was traced to a great extent, and then slightly modified.

shitposter
Newbie cheater

Reputation: 5

Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 13

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:52 pm Post subject:

Oblivious wrote:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

GalaxyFrame wrote:

Pikachu was copied, not from scratch. But it wasn't filtered. You can tell it wasn't filtered by comparing the fingers and tail from the original and the new.

Copying the pose isn't the same thing as copying, or tracing.

Showing your idiocy yet again, Phox. You basically just said 'copying it isn't the same as copying it'. Yes it is. It's a Pikachu in the EXACT same pose as the original picture, just redrawn.

Konr, shut the fuck up, no one gives a shit.
All you're doing is sounding like you're trying to bash Pho/x/ because you hate him. Regardless of whether or not you're actually doing that.
Get out of the art section unless you stop being a giant cunt.

Konr hates everyone.

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:16 pm Post subject:

Oblivious wrote:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

GalaxyFrame wrote:

Pikachu was copied, not from scratch. But it wasn't filtered. You can tell it wasn't filtered by comparing the fingers and tail from the original and the new.

Copying the pose isn't the same thing as copying, or tracing.

Showing your idiocy yet again, Phox. You basically just said 'copying it isn't the same as copying it'. Yes it is. It's a Pikachu in the EXACT same pose as the original picture, just redrawn.

Nope. I'm only talking to Pho/x/ like that because he disagreed with something I know is a fact. I'm only setting him straight, not being a cunt.

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:54 am Post subject:

Oblivious wrote:

konr wrote:

Oblivious wrote:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

konr wrote:

Pho/x/ wrote:

GalaxyFrame wrote:

Pikachu was copied, not from scratch. But it wasn't filtered. You can tell it wasn't filtered by comparing the fingers and tail from the original and the new.

Copying the pose isn't the same thing as copying, or tracing.

Showing your idiocy yet again, Phox. You basically just said 'copying it isn't the same as copying it'. Yes it is. It's a Pikachu in the EXACT same pose as the original picture, just redrawn.

Nope. I'm only talking to Pho/x/ like that because he disagreed with something I know is a fact. I'm only setting him straight, not being a cunt.

>not being a cunt

konr wrote:

Honestly, you're retarded

konr wrote:

Showing your idiocy yet again, Phox

You say time and time again you only give straight critiques.

Well I'm just going to say this:

STRAIGHT CRITIQUES USUALLY DON'T ENTAIL BEING A CUNT

Actually, they do. Apparently I'm not allowed to share an opinion with someone that continues to do the same thing repeatedly? Nah.

Display posts from previous:

	Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Art	All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous 1, 2
Page 2 of 2

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum