| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Odd
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 1
Joined: 01 Apr 2010
Posts: 41
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:21 am Post subject: Myspace Layout |
 |
|
| Sorry for the huge attachment, but I'm not allowed to post URL's yet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Polynomial
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 5
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 524
Location: Inside the Intel CET shadow stack
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can see two (well, three) problems with this design:
1) Colours of the titles such as "Trading Voices Information" and "BLOG" are so washed out that it's near impossible to read them on some monitors. Remember that whilst your monitor settings and colour profile might make it so they look quite readable, I'm a potential user (with no visual impairments, I might add) and I had to tilt my laptop screen around to see them. Bring the saturation of the text colour up so it's easier to see.
2) The title logo is so huge that when you open the page on a 1366x768 monitor, it's just a picture of your logo. It looks like a landing/gateway page or something, and can be confusing. You should ALWAYS have your real content visible on screen when the page loads without the need for the user to scroll. Also, test your work from 1024x768 up to the highest res your available hardware can manage (I usually test up to 1920x1200 or 2560x1600). Cut down the size of the logo, it'll be much better.
3) You're using MySpace. Eugh.
Other than that it's pretty much OK, as far as MySpace layouts go. I have definately seen much much MUCH MUCH MUCH worse pages.
_________________
It's not fun unless every exploit mitigation is enabled.
Please do not reply to my posts with LLM-generated slop; I consider it to be an insult to my time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Trucido
Moderator
![]() Reputation: 6
Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 2792
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMO the thick white stroke does nothing for the text, along with the white cumstain up the top left.
_________________
I'm out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Polynomial
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 5
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 524
Location: Inside the Intel CET shadow stack
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yeah, I didn't see that bit. Ewwww, it doesn't fit the design at all.
_________________
It's not fun unless every exploit mitigation is enabled.
Please do not reply to my posts with LLM-generated slop; I consider it to be an insult to my time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Odd
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 1
Joined: 01 Apr 2010
Posts: 41
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Burningmace wrote: | I can see two (well, three) problems with this design:
1) Colours of the titles such as "Trading Voices Information" and "BLOG" are so washed out that it's near impossible to read them on some monitors. Remember that whilst your monitor settings and colour profile might make it so they look quite readable, I'm a potential user (with no visual impairments, I might add) and I had to tilt my laptop screen around to see them. Bring the saturation of the text colour up so it's easier to see.
2) The title logo is so huge that when you open the page on a 1366x768 monitor, it's just a picture of your logo. It looks like a landing/gateway page or something, and can be confusing. You should ALWAYS have your real content visible on screen when the page loads without the need for the user to scroll. Also, test your work from 1024x768 up to the highest res your available hardware can manage (I usually test up to 1920x1200 or 2560x1600). Cut down the size of the logo, it'll be much better.
3) You're using MySpace. Eugh.
Other than that it's pretty much OK, as far as MySpace layouts go. I have definately seen much much MUCH MUCH MUCH worse pages. |
I use Facebook too! haha
Well yeah I see what you're saying, thanks for the feedback man 
| Trucido wrote: | | IMO the thick white stroke does nothing for the text, along with the white cumstain up the top left. |
Lmao I thought it looked like a cumstain aswell.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ShadowHopeful
Expert Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 122
Location: ~Cyberspace. Yours.~
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Odded wrote: | | Burningmace wrote: | I can see two (well, three) problems with this design:
1) Colours of the titles such as "Trading Voices Information" and "BLOG" are so washed out that it's near impossible to read them on some monitors. Remember that whilst your monitor settings and colour profile might make it so they look quite readable, I'm a potential user (with no visual impairments, I might add) and I had to tilt my laptop screen around to see them. Bring the saturation of the text colour up so it's easier to see.
2) The title logo is so huge that when you open the page on a 1366x768 monitor, it's just a picture of your logo. It looks like a landing/gateway page or something, and can be confusing. You should ALWAYS have your real content visible on screen when the page loads without the need for the user to scroll. Also, test your work from 1024x768 up to the highest res your available hardware can manage (I usually test up to 1920x1200 or 2560x1600). Cut down the size of the logo, it'll be much better.
3) You're using MySpace. Eugh.
Other than that it's pretty much OK, as far as MySpace layouts go. I have definately seen much much MUCH MUCH MUCH worse pages. |
I use Facebook too! haha
|
This is a MYSPACE layout.
Nice layout.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sag
Advanced Cheater
![]() Reputation: 1
Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Posts: 70
Location: sage
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ShadowHopeful wrote: | | Odded wrote: | | Burningmace wrote: | I can see two (well, three) problems with this design:
1) Colours of the titles such as "Trading Voices Information" and "BLOG" are so washed out that it's near impossible to read them on some monitors. Remember that whilst your monitor settings and colour profile might make it so they look quite readable, I'm a potential user (with no visual impairments, I might add) and I had to tilt my laptop screen around to see them. Bring the saturation of the text colour up so it's easier to see.
2) The title logo is so huge that when you open the page on a 1366x768 monitor, it's just a picture of your logo. It looks like a landing/gateway page or something, and can be confusing. You should ALWAYS have your real content visible on screen when the page loads without the need for the user to scroll. Also, test your work from 1024x768 up to the highest res your available hardware can manage (I usually test up to 1920x1200 or 2560x1600). Cut down the size of the logo, it'll be much better.
3) You're using MySpace. Eugh.
Other than that it's pretty much OK, as far as MySpace layouts go. I have definately seen much much MUCH MUCH MUCH worse pages. |
I use Facebook too! haha
|
This is a MYSPACE layout.
Nice layout. |
Are you stupid or what? He's the fucking maker of the thread. He knows what layout it is. He's replying to the dude saying 'ugh' at MySpace. Fuck.
_________________
sage |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
trebor
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 21
Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 816
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Great as always.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
