| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Polynomial Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 524 Location: Inside the Intel CET shadow stack
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm using a Dell 2407WFP 24" LCD monitor at 1920x1200 - Highest so far on this thread ^_^
Oh, and when I'm at work I use a dual-DVI link WQXGA monitor that runs at 2560x1600 native resolution.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Heartless I post too much
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 2436
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1024x768, any higher would hurt my eyes.
_________________
What dosen't kill you, usually does the second time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wcbrilman Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 11
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 690 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1440 × 900
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willy Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 280 Location: Woodlands
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1440x900 for my new 20' monitor.
My old 17' was 1280x1024.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilxkid224 Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 332
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HornyAZNBoy wrote: | | 1024x768, any higher would hurt my eyes. |
why the bigger resolution the more workspace you get
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg I'm a spammer
Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 5801
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1440x900
going to upgrade computer sometime around christmas, might throw down for one of those new 1920x1080 monitors.
Looks like 16:10 is going south as 16:9 is cheaper to manufacture. Extra pixels be damned, I like it more anyway.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icklorfin I post too much
Reputation: -1
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 2346
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1280x1024 :/ cant go any higher.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|