| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Daaamon
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 1443
Location: Southern California
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Crysis on highest settings?
OH I THINK SO!
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Currently using PCI-E |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
carlossilva22
Expert Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 144
Location: What Do You Think??
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
That Thing Is HUGE O_o
_________________
You Rep Me, I rep You, Deal??
Please Click on the Egg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| One is much newer and much faster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DeletedUser14087
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 2
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 3069
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Daaamon wrote: | Crysis on highest settings?
OH I THINK SO! |
Crysis disappointed me, i played it on the highest graphics and it worked smooth, but the game just sucked, seriously.
Call of duty 4 is better |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shady253
Master Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 318
Location: Connecticut
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HornyAZNBoy wrote: | | OMG! One cost about $500.00! Forget it, I will wait a year or until the prices go dow to about $200.00 to $300.00. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cheetah
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Nov 2007
Posts: 2758
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kaspersky wrote: | | Daaamon wrote: | Crysis on highest settings?
OH I THINK SO! |
Crysis disappointed me, i played it on the highest graphics and it worked smooth, but the game just sucked, seriously.
Call of duty 4 is better |
If you're talking about your own machine with your 8600gt, there's no way you could run it at the highest settings and not have a sideshow, so either you did something wrong or your settings are messed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jaju123
Expert Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 217
Location: On your desktop
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kaspersky wrote: | | Daaamon wrote: | Crysis on highest settings?
OH I THINK SO! |
Crysis disappointed me, i played it on the highest graphics and it worked smooth, but the game just sucked, seriously.
Call of duty 4 is better |
So you're using Vista and you ran it from the DX10 codepath with everything on Very High?
Game must have fkin been sweet at 4 fps dude.
Also my idea of "looks better" isn't make everything 5x as saturated.
Last edited by hcavolsdsadgadsg on Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xDev
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 7
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 971
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would LOVE if they still made a AGP version
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UnLmtD
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 894
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh wow, I just realized it uses a G92 core chip. Should be called 8800GX2.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cheetah
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Nov 2007
Posts: 2758
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xdeviance wrote: | | I would LOVE if they still made a AGP version |
Problem is:
-AGP doesn't have the bandwidth to keep up with a card like this and would hinder the performance, probably quite significantly
-Any system still on AGP would likely be limited by a slow CPU
If the card is 2x GTX's like it looks like, then I believe the price is totally justified, seeing as a single one generally costs more than $500.
Only good thing I guess is nVidia has slowed down progress because there's no competition, so at least AMD will have a chance to catch up, unlike the whole AMD/Intel situation  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Heartless
I post too much
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 2436
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cheetah wrote: |
...
Only good thing I guess is nVidia has slowed down progress because there's no competition, so at least AMD will have a chance to catch up, unlike the whole AMD/Intel situation |
Intel is only winning because of the Quad core and the Core 2 Extremes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UnLmtD
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 894
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HornyAZNBoy wrote: | | Cheetah wrote: |
...
Only good thing I guess is nVidia has slowed down progress because there's no competition, so at least AMD will have a chance to catch up, unlike the whole AMD/Intel situation |
Intel is only winning because of the Quad core and the Core 2 Extremes. |
AMD already has the equivalent of those out. But it's just not as good as Intel's products.
| Cheetah wrote: |
Only good thing I guess is nVidia has slowed down progress because there's no competition |
IMO, that's a bad thing.
_________________
Last edited by UnLmtD on Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
