2017-11-21 14:51 CET

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000200Cheat Enginepublic2013-01-12 12:11
Reporterablonevn 
Assigned ToDark Byte 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
StatusresolvedResolutionfixed 
Summary0000200: Funny group scan
Descriptiontoday, i have try to using group scan for the first step in tutorial, when i'm using generate struct scan in structure dissect, it generate a funny pattern like this:
4:0x00592ABC 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 8:* 4:* 4:95
so, i wonder to ask why you don't combine 8:* and 4:* to "w" pattern ? and another issue is when you scan this pattern CE report "overflow" memory error. :D
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

-Relationships
+Relationships

-Notes

~0000426

Dark Byte (developer)

this was implemented before the w: parameter was added, I'll update it
+Notes

-Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2013-01-08 12:47 ablonevn New Issue
2013-01-11 11:54 Dark Byte Note Added: 0000426
2013-01-11 11:54 Dark Byte Status new => confirmed
2013-01-12 12:11 Dark Byte Status confirmed => resolved
2013-01-12 12:11 Dark Byte Resolution open => fixed
2013-01-12 12:11 Dark Byte Assigned To => Dark Byte
+Issue History